July 29

Please upgrade to 0.3.6 ASAP! We fixed an implementation bug where it was possible that bogus transactions could be displayed as accepted. Do not accept Bitcoin transactions as payment until you upgrade to version 0.3…

Quote from: lachesis on July 29, 2010, 10:14:36 PM On Debian testing 32-bit, I get a few build errors, all resembling: Code: script.cpp:114: error: ‘OP_NOP1’ was not declared in this scope I got these when attempting…

"./bitcoin: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by ./bitcoin)" isn't a new problem that started with 0.3.6 is it? This was built on the same OS installations as 0.3.0. Unfortunately I upgraded t…

0.3.6 Linux build is back to the old makefile.unix. It static links libjpeg so that shouldn't be a problem. Is that working better? If you got 22DbRunRecoveryException and you've used someone else's build before, you…

SVN is updated with version 0.3.6. Uploading Windows build of 0.3.6 to Sourceforge now, then will rebuild linux.

Haven't had time to update the SVN yet. Wait for 0.3.6, I'm building it now. You can shut down your node in the meantime.

You were looking at the wrong code. Here's the code that applies: Code: bool CBlock::CheckBlock() const { ... // Check timestamp if (nTime > GetAdjustedTime() + 2 * 60 * 60) return error("CheckBlock() : block times…

Actually, it works well to just PM me. I'm the one who's going to be fixing it. If you find a security flaw, I would definitely like to hear from you privately to fix it before it goes public.

Yeah, acutely aware that I should have stayed on 9.04 or 9.10. It's a lot more work to downgrade than upgrade and I've been squeezed for time. Ubuntu is the most popular distro, so I'm staying with that.

The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users…

If the transaction didn't go out immediately at first, like if you weren't connected at the time, it may take up to 2 hours to resend it. Long term, it does keep relentlessly sending it. I'll shorten that length of ti…

WTF? How did we get on that? AFAIK, the only e-mail is if you tell the forum to do notifications, and I guess the wiki registration. I'd consider turning off the forum notification e-mails, I don't know why we have that.